Drifting Away From Whisky?

Am I?
Yeah, you.
Away from whisky?
Never. Never.
Not even just a little?


Well, yeah, okay, a little. Maybe a little more than a little. I don’t think I’ve grown tired of whisky, or tired of drinking it, or learning about its past, or writing about it. I have grown a little tired of the fallout from its surge in popularity – the rising prices, the homogenization, and the unstoppable tide of marketing bullshit, but for all intents and purposes, I still like whisky quite a bit. I would say, though, that over the last year and a half, I’ve found myself equally (if not occasionally more) interested in a few of the other branches of this great gnarled tree of booze. Yes, there’s been dabbling in Rum and Armagnac, and perhaps quite a bit more than just dabbling in Gin, but what’s really piqued my interest of late is lower alcohol spirits: Amaros, apéritifs, vermouths, sherries, and those odd, provincial liqueurs that everyone ignores until some bartender says they shouldn’t ignore them anymore.

So consider this a warning. There’ll probably be more than a few reviews of this kind of thing in the coming months. As with whisky, I’ll be taking a look at the associated histories, both real and concocted, and jotting down needlessly verbose, yet slightly repetitive tasting notes. Some of these spirits are more geared towards cocktails, so I’ll try to place them in that context when that context calls for it. I hope this all sounds as exciting to you as it does to me. If it sounds less exciting to you than it does to me, then I don’t know what to tell you. I’ll probably just keep plugging away regardless.

Coming up in the next two or three…or ten months provided that I get around to posting the posts:

  • Several bitter, herbal things including locally produced Minnesota-made amaro from Tattersall Distilling.
  • A couple of very affordable, very common, very good London Dry gins.
  • Some easy-to-find, inexpensive vermouths because why not.
  • Some Pastis because it is Summer after all, and I’d forgotten how much I love Pastis.
  • Beer? Fuck it. Sure, beer too, what the hell.
  • And just to prove I haven’t abandoned whisky, or whiskey, some new indie bottlings from those Single Cask Nation guys, probably some bourbon, some incredibly ubiquitous blended Scotch, and most likely that semi-obscure corn whiskey that everyone needs a bottle of if only for the label.

Happy Summer, people. Please drink moderately and responsibly.


Minor Case Straight Rye Whiskey – Review

*Sincere thanks to Common Ground PR and Limestone Branch Distillery for the sample.

One could say that there really is no overstating the importance and influence the Beam family has had on the bourbon industry. That, of course, would be overstating things, but not by much. Jacob Beam and his sons married powerful, brave women that gave birth to, and raised literally dozens of little Beams, many of whom were involved in whiskey-making, and had many little Beams of their own. And some of those little Beams were involved in whiskey-making as well. Beams have served as owners and distillers of a great many distilleries, bringing years of passed-down experience, technique, and even yeast strains with them, giving the bourbon world an indelible and inescapable legacy.

One of these Beams, the wonderfully named Minor Case, was the son of Joseph B. Beam, who was the son of David Beam, who was the son of Jacob Beam, the paterfamilias of the entire bourbon-making Beam clan. Born in 1857, Minor Case worked at several distilleries before buying Orene Parker’s share and becoming part owner of the F.M. Head Distillery in the late 1800’s. The Head & Beam Distillery lasted until 1900 when Minor Case purchased Head’s share and the distillery was renamed the M.C. Beam Distillery. In 1910, Minor Case sold his namesake plant to J.B. Dant who needed to increase production of his popular Yellowstone brand. Minor Case Beam died in 1934, shortly after Prohibition ended. His son, Guy Beam, as well as two of his grandsons, Jack and Walter, also worked in the bourbon industry. In 2011, Minor Case’s great-grandsons, Stephen and Paul Beam, jumped back into their family’s legacy and founded the Limestone Branch Distillery.

In 2015, the Beam brothers sold a 50% stake in their distillery to the large beverage company Luxco. This investment and partnership has allowed them to revitalize not only a family heirloom brand, Yellowstone, but create this new brand that honors their distilling heritage as well. The Minor Case Straight Rye Whiskey comes in a wonderfully designed bottle from David Cole Creative. This designer has been responsible for the visual impact of many of Luxco’s and Limestone Branch’s recent releases, and this one might just be the best yet. The bottle itself was designed by David Cole, an inspired mingling of pre-prohibition flask-style bottles and a memory of “True Grit” cinematic ruggedness. The front features embossed glass lettering and the family crest reportedly used by Minor Case himself for his own labels. Speaking of labels, the front one is made of nicer, heavier weight paper, printed by letterpress, and glued by hand to each bottle. This attention to both visual and tactile quality is not something you see very often with booze bottles. The whole thing is topped off by a wood and cork stopper. From head to toe, this is a beautiful bottle.

I mention the design and detail of this one partly because it truly deserves mentioning, but also because it’s surprising to see this level of  custom design for what is actually a very young whiskey. The Minor Case Straight Rye is a two year old whiskey that’s been finished for around six months in Meiers #44 Cream Sherry casks from Cincinnati’s Meier Wine Cellars. It was distilled by MGP Ingredients in Indiana. However, while there’s a lot of MGP whiskey hiding under different labels these days, there’s a curious newness to this one that makes it stand out. Contrary to what’s been said in other reviews, this one is not made of MGP’s rather ubiquitous 95% rye recipe whiskey. In 2013 MGP began making a 51% rye recipe whiskey alongside their 95% rye recipe, and the flavor profile of this Minor Case Rye definitely hews closer to that of a lower rye recipe whiskey.

It’s interesting to note that Limestone Branch’s partner (and de facto supplier) Luxco, also released a somewhat similar two year old rye earlier this year, the Ezra Brooks Straight Rye. The price point for the Ezra Brooks is much lower, around $20 versus $50 for the Minor Case Rye, and the packaging not quite so elegant. One wonders if the Minor Case is the same whiskey with just a bit of finishing, a selection of the more “honey” barrels picked by Luxco for the two releases, or a slightly different blend of MGP ryes altogether. It’s also interesting to note that Limestone Branch and Luxco thought highly enough of this whiskey to put the Minor Case name on it. The bottle is a fitting homage to the legacy Beam’s great-grandfather and their family’s bourbon heritage, but does the whiskey carry the same class? When I first saw the price of this one, around $50, I have to say I was a  little put off by it. Yeah, the bottle is great, but $50 for a two year old whiskey? It’s hard to not think that you’re just paying for the design work here, but let us not judge a whiskey by its cover…

The Nose:  Relatively little youthful heat, mostly this is a nice, complex nose that leans towards the sweeter side. There’s candied orange slices, vanilla syrup, and cherry juice ahead of subtler hints of pralined almonds, and dried red fruits. The rye is relatively quiet, showing up as a lightly spicy, slightly herbal counterpoint to the sweetness. There’s a little oak here, sanded, toasted boards, maybe a faint whiff of cedar closet, too. Spice wise, there’s cinnamon red hots and baking spices of nutmeg, vanilla bean, ginger powder, and a little clove.

The Palate:  A little hotter initially than the nose, but still, less so than you’d expect for such a young whiskey. The red fruits of the sherry cask’s labor are more prevalent here, macerated cherries and currant jam, along with juicy oranges and dark honey. The rye is sharper here as well, peppery and toasted. There’s nice notes of semi-sweet chocolate and roasted salted almonds that lead to some mildly tannic oak and a swell of more cinnamon, clove, vanilla bean, a little nutmeg, and a bit of black pepper.

The Finish:  A lengthy mingling of dusty red fruit, dark chocolate, baking spice and mouth-watering grippy oak.

Thoughts:  So good. This whiskey is surprisingly impressive. The sherry cask finishing has taken some of the expected rough, young rye character out of the equation, but it’s added a layer of sweet complexity and maturity. While there is a bit of brash youth, there’s also balance here, integration, and nice progression from start to finish. MGP has made some very nice whiskey and Limestone Branch has deftly added another dimension to it. I love having this bottle on my shelf, and I’m quickly finding that I love having it in a glass as well. Luxco has been putting out a lot of very good whiskey lately in some very nicely designed packaging. The high price of many of these has been my only real gripe. With the Minor Case Rye, I’m damn near flabbergasted that I may actually think the price is worth it. Definitely recommended.

Minor Case Straight Rye Whiskey, +/-2017

45% ABV

Score:  86



Blood Oath Pact No. 3 Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey – Review

*Sincere thanks to Common Ground PR and Luxco for the sample.

I hate to say it, but I think I kind of overdid it on the Blood Oath Pact No.2 review. I pretty much threw every blood oath I could google in a short period of time into one review, and now, here I am with another Blood Oath whiskey to expound on and I’ve got nothing. Sure, I could spend even more time going down some interwebs rabbit hole, but really, what else am I going to find? An obscure stunt pulled by pseudo-lumberjack wrestler named Jos LeDuc, who famously swore a blood oath in an attempt to end Jerry “the King” Lawler’s career? Nah. Besides, being a Milwaukee boy, I always preferred The Crusher. And if I had to pick non-local squared circle heroes, then maybe I’d root for those High Flyers, Jumpin’ Jim Brunzell and Greg Gagne.

So, yeah, I don’t have all that much to say about actual blood oaths this time, which is perhaps all for the best. Even I think I’ve gotten pretty long-winded lately, maybe it’s time to just cut right to the chase. Luxco’s Blood Oath Pact No. 3 Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey is, as the number three suggests, the third Blood Oath to hit the shelves. Pact No. 1 was made up of a 12 year old high rye bourbon, a 7 year old high rye bourbon, and a 6 year old wheated bourbon. Pact. No. 2 consisted of an 11 year old high rye bourbon, 11 year old wheated bourbon, and 7 year old high rye bourbon that had been finished in Port barrels. Released in a “limited” edition of 30,000 bottles in March of 2017, Pact No. 3 is comprised of three high rye bourbons: a 12 year old, a 7 year old, and another 7 year old that’s been finished in Cabernet Sauvignon barrels from Napa Valley’s Swanson Vineyards. As with the previous Blood Oaths, Pact No. 3 comes beautifully packaged in a pine box and retro/vintage-y labeling.

The Nose:  A weighty, rich balance of sweetness and oak. There’s floral honey, tart pie cherries, a little bit of cherry cola, juicy oranges, and a hint of burnt banana meringue. The rye is strong and both herbal and toasted…fresh baked rye bread maybe. There’s solid vanilla bean notes as well as hints of candied almonds. The oak is polished and smoothly tannic with a touch of worn leather. Holding down the spicy side of things, there’s Vietnamese cinnamon, nutmeg, a hint of fennel root, and a just bit of warmed corn oil towards the end.

The Palate:  Even more oak forward than the nose, but it’s still nicely complimented by sweet notes of more cherry cola, juicy ripe oranges, dark red fruits, and floral honey. The rye is still strong, lightly toasted with peppery herbal notes blooming towards the end. The nuttiness is now more roasted and salted and the vanilla bean earthy and vegetal. Though the oak is coarser here, and more tannic, it’s still well-integrated. There’s cut staves, allspice, nutmeg, raw ginger, and black pepper,

The Finish:  Lengthy and dominated by oak and spice. There’s a bit of cola and vanilla syrup sweetness, but mostly it’s nicely tannic and full of baking spices and ground pepper.

Thoughts:  Fairly excellent. This is a well put together bourbon that shows off the mashbill nicely and adds a subtle layer of complexity thanks to the wine cask finishing. The wine influence comes through in the form of red fruits and perhaps a little dusty oak and spice, but it’s so well incorporated that it doesn’t stand out as “the finished part.” I enjoyed Pact No. 2 very much, and thought it did a good job of showing off its components, but Pact No. 3 comes across as a more cohesive whiskey. The nose is more expressive and the palate slightly more tempered and balanced. Once again, the price is an issue for me. Luxco clearly has a good thing going, and they’ve judged their market well, but the ~$100 price tag of this one strikes me as high. Still, the whiskey itself, damn good and certainly recommended.

Blood Oath Pact No. 3 Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey, +/-2017

49.3% ABv (98.6 degrees…I mean, proof)

Score:  88




Usquaebach An Ard Ri Blended Malt Scotch Whisky – Review

*Sincere thanks to Usquaebach and Colangelo PR for the sample.

The Usquaebach brand is one of those brands that manages to be both oft-seen and under-the-radar at the same time. Their white and tan stoneware flagon-ed Old Rare Blended Whisky is a rather familiar sight on store shelves, but you just don’t hear much about the whiskies. Oh sure, there’s the occasional print ad, or random review, but really, this is a brand with a relatively low profile. Hell, until late last year when they released the An Ard Ri, Usquaebach apparently hadn’t made a change to their three-expression line-up in over 25 years.

The Gaelic an ard ri means “the high king,” and is a perhaps hyperbolic nod to Usquaebach’s longevity in the marketplace. While the brand is owned by the U.S.-based Cobalt Brands, the whisky is provided by Hunter Laing & Co. For this new, fairly limited release, Hunter Laing’s master blender, Stewart Laing, created an all-malt blend of whiskies reportedly from Auchroisk, Blair Athol, Benrinnes, Craigellachie, Dailuaine, Glengoyne and Inchgower among others. With the exceptions of Craigellachie and Glengoyne, these are not distilleries you hear about all that often. They are workhorses and the majority of their output goes to some of the big blended Scotch brands. For the Usquaebach An Ard Ri Blended Malt Scotch Whisky, Laing chose single malts between 10 and 21 years old and bottled it at a “cask strength” of 57.1%. This release was limited to 2000 bottles…I’m sorry, flagons. Yes, that’s right, the Old Rare will no longer be the only flagon on the block. The An Ard Ri comes in a striking blue one with a similarly striking $200 price tag.

The Nose:  A rich yet slightly taut, complex nose that’s almost savory at times. Initially, there’s light, floral honey, overripe pineapple, honeydew melon, and a mineral, almost white wine fruitiness. Close behind, malt syrup, cereal flakes, and leftover cereal milk mingle with almond extract and a hint of toasted pecans. There are some subtle old library notes, smooth and worn oak, and leather, and mild spice notes of vanilla bean, peppercorns, allspice, dried star anise, and clove. Behind all of this, loitering in the shadows, is a faint hint of peat. Adding a little water adds a bit of citrus sweetness, plays up the milky malt a bit more and gives everything a little more room to breath.

The Palate:  A quite nice, lush, viscous mouthfeel. There’s darker honey now, along with juicy raisins, prunes, and mixed tropical fruits. While there’s still notes of caramelized grain, there’s additional hints of bittersweet chocolate, and a more pronounced nuttiness – salted almonds and candied walnuts. The oak is sturdier but still of the old library variety. The spices are stronger and lightly herbal with quite a bit of black pepper and raw ginger, Vietnamese cinnamon, clove, and a bit of fennel. As with the nose, water brings out more citrus and a bit more nutty complexity.

The Finish:  A slightly wine-y, honey and raisin sweetness fades slowly along with a slightly bitter nuttiness, and a mix of tannic oak and spice.

Thoughts:  A very nice whisky that manages to have both a young vibrancy and a nice dose of mature complexity. The nose, while compact and integrated, offers quite a range to explore. The palate is more straightforward, but echoes much of the nose and adds more oak influence to the mix. While this was drinkable at strength, I found just a little water opened the nose up nicely and brought more fruitiness out which balanced the wood and spice even further. The $200 price tag is a bit of an eyebrow raiser. Yes, it’s a very limited release, and yes, the price is more or less in line with where we’re unfortunately at in terms of price these days, but that doesn’t necessarily justify it. It’s easy to recommend the whisky itself, it’s quite good. It’s harder to recommend it at this high of a price.

Usquaebach An Ard Ri Blended Malt Scotch Whisky, IB, +/- 2016

57.1% ABV

Score:  86


Rabbit Hole Distilling Kentucky Straight Rye – Review

*Sincere thanks to Rabbit Hole Distilling for the sample.

Rabbit Hole Distilling’s Kentucky Straight Rye, like their Kentucky Straight Bourbon, was contract distilled reportedly by New Riff Distilling. Sure, sure, that in and of itself isn’t super exciting, but what if I told you the mashbill for this rye was 95% rye and 5% malted barley. Nothing too interesting there either, right? There are a great many rye whiskeys on the shelves that use that same mashbill: Bulleit Rye, George Dickel Rye, Redemption Rye…probably three or 15 others. They all use that same 95% rye recipe whiskey produced at MGP Ingredients in Indiana. But wait, you say, I thought you said New Riff in Kentucky made the Rabbit Hole Rye, not MGP Ingredients in Indiana. Well, I can’t slip anything by you, now, can I? Sharp as a tack and it’s not even Friday yet.

MGP’s somewhat ubiquitous 95% rye recipe did serve as Rabbit Hole’s inspiration for this whiskey. To produce the stuff at New Riff, they turned to someone who knew that recipe pretty well, Larry Ebersold, who served as Master Distiller at MGP back when it was called LDI and before that when it was known as the Seagram Lawrenceburg Plant. Ebersold is not the only industry veteran Rabbit Hole has turned to for consulting help. They’ve also enlisted Dave Scheurich, who, up until his retirement in 2011, was the master distiller and leading force behind Woodford Reserve, and Randy Allender, a production veteran who spent over two decades with Jim Beam. Leading the production at the new Rabbit Hole distillery will be Cameron Talley, who previously served in production manager and supervisor roles with Brown-Forman and Gruppo Campari.

So, it looks like this new company has wisely enlisted a lot of experienced help to get their brand off the ground. They’ve also wisely decided, with this rye and their straight bourbon, to start with younger spirits that are bit off the beaten path. When the Rabbit Hole Distillery is up and running towards the end of 2017, it will be far easier to have their own spirit catch up to their young contracted stuff than it would’ve been to try to replicate the success of some older, more familiar, sourced stuff. Like their bourbon, the Rabbit Hole Rye is two years old and has been aged in new American Oak barrels made by the Kelvin Cooperage. It’s worth noting that both this rye and the straight bourbon have been bottled at a generous 47.5% ABV.

The Nose:  Raw-ish stuff, with quite a bit of alcoholic heat. There’s some sweetness at first, cinnamon infused honey and crème brûlée, and a bit of fruit in the form of orange peel and slightly underripe bananas, but this is pretty darn grain forward. And that grain would be, not surprisingly, rye. Here, it’s crackling and green, herbal, a little minty, and slightly peppery with hints of dried prairie grass. There’s a bit of that familiar MGP 95% rye dill pickle note, but that’s less present than it is in, say, the Bulleit Rye. While there’s not too much wood, there is ragged cinnamon, clove, and burnt sugar behind all that rye.

The Palate:  While still youngish and hot, this is vaguely reminiscent of the Thomas Handy Ryes – robust and grain forward. Initially, there’s a very nice, creamy mouthfeel that has more burnt sugars, fresh orange peel, and red currant jam. After that, raw vanilla bean and dark chocolate. The strongish rye, while still somewhat raw and grassy, now also gains complexity and brings some nice toasted notes. A little tannic oak shows up towards the end with more cinnamon, clove, and Tellicherry peppercorns.

The Finish:  Somewhat lengthy with surprising bit of marshmallow early, and more herbal, toasted rye, tannic wood spice and clove towards the end.

Thoughts:  Pretty good. The nose was okay here, but didn’t impress me overly much. I really enjoyed the palate, which gained some depth and somehow managed to make it all seem a little older than it is. There was just a bit too much youth to the nose, it did show off the mashbill nicely, but I found it a bit too jarring. The palate follows the adage that very young ryes can be very good – it’s complex, balanced and progresses nicely all the way to the end. While the nose kept me from liking this more, and the ~$50 price tag seems steep, the impressive palate hints at a lot of potential down the road.

Rabbit Hole Distilling Kentucky Straight Rye, +/-2016

47.5% ABV

Score:  80


Rabbit Hole Distilling Kentucky Straight Bourbon – Review

*Sincere thanks to Rabbit Hole Distilling for the sample.

One of the hardest things about this craft spirits boom of the last several years has been separating the wheat from the chaff. Distinguishing not just the true distillers from the opportunistic source-and-bottlers, but also between the ones who are generally honest and upfront, and the ones that hide behind carefully crafted marketing. While, yes, we can all agree that selling a product relies on marketing, there is a difference between using a few extra superlatives in a brand’s otherwise honest story and just blatantly making up some crap.

With all that in mind, I tend to approach reviewing new craft spirit brands with a mix of about 65% trepidation, and 35% gleeful bloodlust…or depending on the day, 65% gleeful bloodlust, 35% trepidation. In terms of marketing, will I find a load of horseshit, or will I be pleasantly surprised? In the case of the recently reviewed Clyde May’s Bourbon, I found horseshit…a great big silly pile of it. In the case of Louisville, KY’s Rabbit Hole Distilling, I found a mildly pleasant surprise and, I’m not afraid to admit, a small bit of enlightenment.

Founded in 2012 by Kaveh Zamanian, Rabbit Hole Distilling was apparently brought into being by his falling in love with someone who helped him fall in love with Kentucky and with Bourbon. Pretty straight forward, right? No dubious family recipe or backstory, just plain old inspiration…and presumeably a vast reservoir of financial wherewithal to work with. Like many other new distilleries, Rabbit Hole’s plan was to build a craft distillery and in the meantime, release products made elsewhere that hopefully reflected their vision. It’s here that I was pleasantly surprised. All too often, new brands gloss over the fact that they didn’t have much to do with the actual making of the product their label is on. In contrast, Rabbit Hole has been very upfront about their products. While perhaps not completely transparent, they’ve been pretty darn translucent at least, and that’s a refreshing change of pace.

In many of Rabbit Hole’s promotional materials, and in a response to a post on Reddit, Zamanian has been happy to openly discuss his products and has been quick to point out that there’s a difference between contract distilling and sourcing…and that he does a bit of both. This is where the small bit of enlightenment happened for me…or perhaps it was more of a reminder, really. Obviously, there’s a difference between contract distilling and sourcing. A contract distilled spirit is produced to a specification for a brand, whereas a sourced product is more or less a finished one, picked for use by a brand who may or may not treat it further by blending or cask-finishing. I knew all this, but in the muddled haze of all these new brands it’s easy to overlook the difference between the two, and to remember that each has its place and purpose.

For their current line-up, Rabbit Hole has contracted the production of two whiskeys, and sourced product for its other two releases. The sourced products are what Rabbit Hole calls its fingerprint series, meaning that they’ve taken some existing spirit and put a small final stamp on it to make it their own. One is a sourced five year old bourbon that’s been finished in PX sherry casks by Rabbit Hole, and the other will be a sourced London dry gin that’s been aged in their ex-rye barrels. The contract distilled products, the one’s I’ll be taking a look at, include a straight bourbon and a straight rye.

The Rabbit Hole Distilling Kentucky Straight Bourbon was, according to Zamanian’s Reddit post, inspired by craft beer and the non-traditional mashbills of craft distilling championed by folks like Corsair’s Derek Bell. It is made up of 70% corn, 10% malted wheat, 10% malted barley, and 10% honey malt. Obviously, corn and malted barley are no strangers to bourbon, nor is wheat, but malted wheat, that’s a little different. My almost completely uneducated guess would be that using a malted wheat instead of normal wheat would introduce more sugars into the mash, perhaps speeding up fermentation time and sweetening things a little. The honey malt is the real oddball here. Similar to traditional German Brumalt, honey malt is produced by soaking the grain to convert the starch to sugar, drying it, and then roasting to brown the grain and produce a bit of a Maillard Reaction, one of the finest and most loved reactions of all time. This last step renders the sugars mostly unfermentable, therefore, the honey malt is used to more directly flavor and color the water used in the process. In brewing, honey malt and Brumalt are used relatively sparingly, usually in fuller-bodied lagers like Märzens, brown ales, porters and stouts. In distilling…well, I don’t know, this is the first I’ve heard of anyone using honey malt so I guess we’ll see how it affects a whiskey.

While Rabbit Hole does not confirm this in their official literature, it doesn’t seem to be much of a secret that this bourbon has been produced by New Riff Distillery which is located in Newport, KY. This bourbon is two years old and has been matured in the standard new American oak barrels with #3 char. The barrels have been coopered by the Kelvin Cooperage, with whom Zamanian has personal connection owing to the owners being old school friends. The Rabbit Hole Distillery is located in Downtown Louisville and will include not just the distilling plant, but a restaurant, tasting rooms, an event space, and of course, a gift shop. They plan to have construction finished and things up and running by the fall of 2017 at which point they will commence making their own versions of these whiskeys.

The Nose:  Young, slightly hot stuff. Up front, there’s pithy orange, floral honey, and soft, julep-ready mint leaves. Behind that, biscuity notes of those almond windmill cookies, along with cracked wheat crackers, sweet corn pudding, and a subtle bit of toasted rye. As you’d expect,  there’s not a lot of oak on the nose, but there’s a lot of cinnamon red hots, a bit of earthy vanilla bean, and a little candied ginger.

The Palate:  Young, slightly hot stuff with a thinly creamy mouthfeel. The pithy orange is back as is the honey and mint. There’s more brown sugar, but less baked goods, more straight up toasted grain. The rye is more present here as well – greenish, herbal, and sharp. Along with the hot, drying cinnamon, a bit more youthful, slightly grippy oak shows up along with ginger, fine black pepper, and a touch of slightly overcooked popcorn.

The Finish:  Young, slightly hot stuff. Orange peel, almond extract, and floral honey trail off leaving hot cinnamon and mint to finish things off.

Thoughts:  Young slightly hot stuff…but also fairly enjoyable. If the interesting mashbill made itself known, I suppose it would be in the strong grain notes, but I have to say for such a young whiskey, I was hoping for more of that mashbill to come through. This does have its moments though, and succeeds in progressing nicely from nose to finish and keeping its youth (barely) reigned in. Is there enough uniqueness to justify the $~50 price tag for such a brash youngster? That’s harder to say, my inclination is no, but it’s worth keeping in mind that this seems like a good start, and heralds some good things to come as Rabbit Hole’s whiskeys gain a bit more age.

Rabbit Hole Distilling Kentucky Straight Bourbon, +/-2016

47.5% ABV

Score: 80


Why Are Sazerac And Buffalo Trace Trying To Be So Damned Sneaky?

Towards the end of 2016, a class action lawsuit was filed against Buffalo Trace and parent company Sazerac for misrepresenting an Old Charter bourbon to consumers. Old Charter is a storied brand whose history goes back to the late 1800’s. It’s passed through several ownership changes, the last being the sale to Sazerac in 1999. For quite a while under Sazerac’s umbrella, there was a 10 year old Old Charter and an 8 year old Old Charter. Each proudly proclaimed “10 years old” and “8 years old” on the neck label, and in large print on the front label. Each also went on to elaborate in elaborate script that the 10 year old had been “gently matured for ten seasons” and the 8 year old had been “gently matured for eight seasons.” All that seems simple enough, right? 8 years old = eight seasons, 10 years old = ten seasons, that all makes good sense. And even if distilling seasons and barreling dates don’t align quite so precisely, the implication made on those labels is fairly clear.

Back in 2013, the 10 year old was dropped from the roster. Then, in the beginning of 2014, Sazerac and Buffalo trace dropped the age statement from the 8 year old’s label. Well…let me be a little more exact: they dropped the “years” and the “old” part of the age statement from the label. The “8” still stood there proudly on the neck label, now surrounded by some leafy scrollwork design. The part about being matured gently for eight seasons was still there as well. So the Old Charter no longer says “8 years old,” it now just says “8.” The Old Charter “8” is now a non-age-statement bearing whiskey. It does still mention the eight seasons part, however. The plaintiff in the lawsuit has claimed that the quality of the Old Charter 8 has gone down, and since the whiskey is no longer 8 years old, the large, residual “8” on the label constitutes false advertising and deception by Sazerac and Buffalo Trace. While I’ve personally not tried the old Old Charter 8 year old or the new Old Charter non-8 year old, the general consensus in bourbon circles is that the new Old Charter just ain’t what she used to be, ain’t what she used to be, ain’t what she used to be. So it seemed that perhaps this suit had merit. Or not. In January of this year, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed their suit and the case was dropped. Why it was dismissed? Maybe there was an out-of-court settlement or maybe the pursuit became too costly, who knows?

However, the courtroom drama did not end there. On January 27th of this year, a brand new lawsuit was leveled at Buffalo Trace and Sazerac, once again claiming that the companies were labeling their Old Charter product in a misleading way. Not surprisingly, Sazerac and Buffalo Trace didn’t agree. Last week, the defendants filed a motion to have the suit dismissed. In news reports, their reasoning for the motion was summed up in one quote: No reasonable consumer would transform a naked number ‘8’ into saying that the bourbon ‘has been aged for 8 years,’ or translate ‘seasons’ into ‘years.'” It’s important to note that reports on this case were few and quotes probably rather sparse compared to all the non-quoted discussion that happened in the courtroom. It’s also important to note that the quote is just fucking stupid. Apparently, after years of equating years and seasons on their label, Sazerac and Buffalo Trace decided that years and seasons used to be equal before, but now are indeed two completely different, unrelated things and that numbers don’t really need to mean anything. The companies also think that their customers are being unreasonable in equating two things that the companies used to equate themselves, presumably whilst being reasonable.

You may remember that in 2013, Sazerac took their popular Very Old Barton 6 Year Old, and cleverly removed the “years” and “old” on that label as well, leaving just a big ol’ six to make consumers feel unreasonable. Years before that, Sazerac also pushed the limits of consumer reasonability by releasing an easy to find, not 10 years old Ancient Age Ten Star alongside the harder to find Ancient Age Ten Year Old. To my knowledge these moves did not generate any lawsuits, but they do help in generating a bit of a pattern.

So, Sazerac and Buffalo Trace…what the hell? You keep doing this and it’s just seems kind of slimy. You keep dropping the age statement, but conveniently keep the damn number on the label. Why? What other purpose does that number serve but to relate back to the age the whiskey no longer is? And then, when you’re called out for being sneaky and borderline deceitful, you deride your customers for being unreasonable about falling for the confusion you hoped to generate in the first place. Sure, from a legal standpoint you might end up being ok, but that doesn’t mean you’re not being kind of an asshole to your customers. You’ve done it at least three times now, Buffalo Trace, and the technique doesn’t seem to play all that well in the court of public opinion.. If you’re going to drop an age statement, stop fucking around and drop the number associated with the age statement as well. Or, just come right out and say that you’re trying to subtly and legally trick people. At the very least, maybe we consumers would be reasonable enough to appreciate the honesty.